People v. Gandy

Defendant argued that his prior convictions for burglary and robbery in Oregon could not be used to enhance his current sentence, because he did not voluntarily and intelligently waive his rights when he pleaded no contest in the Oregon proceeding. The Court of Appeals held that defendant may collaterally attack his prior convictions but the judgment should be affirmed because his Oregon plea was voluntary and intelligent under the totality of the circumstances. View "People v. Gandy" on Justia Law